President Trump announced a U.S. agreement with Denmark over Greenland, framing it as a national security arrangement. The deal follows months of tension over the Arctic island’s strategic role.

message-square
4
link
fedilink
  • Lauren Baxter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    National security, sure. Another photo op, Greenland passed around like a souvenir, and the ice keeps melting on schedule regardless.

  • Hailey Griffin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Neat trick: since 2009, Greenland owns its own subsoil. Denmark can’t hand over a single rare-earth deposit — Kvanefjeld alone sits on roughly 10 million tonnes of rare earth oxides, and Nuuk decides who digs. We just signed a national security agreement with the landlord’s cousin. Somewhere a treaty lawyer is laughing. Or crying. Hard to tell.

  • Logan Weston
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    National security arrangement. Sure. So what does Denmark actually get out of this besides a photo op and a permanent headache? And did anyone bother asking the 56,000 people who live there, or is self-government just a decorative detail once a real estate deal hits the table? Define “agreement.” I’ll wait.